{"id":1538,"date":"2025-01-09T10:00:17","date_gmt":"2025-01-09T13:00:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/humanas.blog.scielo.org\/en\/?p=1538"},"modified":"2025-01-08T14:20:04","modified_gmt":"2025-01-08T17:20:04","slug":"social-psychology-theories-and-their-impact-on-racism-studies-in-brazil","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/humanas.blog.scielo.org\/en\/2025\/01\/09\/social-psychology-theories-and-their-impact-on-racism-studies-in-brazil\/","title":{"rendered":"Social Psychology theories and their impact on racism studies in Brazil"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>By Marcus Eug\u00eanio Oliveira Lima, Professor Titular de Psicologia, Universidade Federal de Sergipe (UFSE), Aracaju, SE, Brazil<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/humanas.blog.scielo.org\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2017\/11\/paideia_logo.gif\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignright wp-image-198 size-full\" title=\"Logo of the Paideia Journal\" src=\"https:\/\/humanas.blog.scielo.org\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2017\/11\/paideia_logo.gif\" alt=\"Logo of the Paideia Journal\" width=\"300\" height=\"87\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>The article <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1590\/1982-4327e3403\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Theories in Social Psychology: Intra-individual Explanations in the Racism Analysis in Brazil<\/a>, published in the journal <em>Paid\u00e9ia (Ribeir\u00e3o Preto)<\/em>, aimed to analyze the explanatory power that classic and modern theories of social psychology have for understanding racism in Brazil. Four intra-individual theories were considered, three of which are broader \u2014 the Authoritarian Personality Theory, the Closed Mind Hypothesis and the Social Dominance Theory \u2014 and one that is more specific to racism \u2014 the Aversive Racism Theory.<\/p>\n<p>The first two general explanations date from the 1950s and 1960s. The Social Dominance Theory was formulated in the 1990s and Aversive Racism in the 1980s. Despite the long existence of these theories, ranging from 30 to 70 years old, and the fact that some of them are among the most important psychosocial theories, none have been adapted for empirical analysis of racism in Brazil, according to our search of papers available within <em>CAPES-Peri\u00f3dicos<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>Our proposal is both important and challenging; challenging because, to the best of our knowledge, this task has not yet been done. And it is important due to two prevailing behaviors in Brazil: one is highly critical, arguing that imported theories fail to facilitate an understanding of racism in Brazil and merely demonstrate the intellectual colonization of the country; and the other tends to be uncritical, adopting theories and analytical models without adequately contextualizing them to the Brazilian reality. Both positions end up not contributing as much as they could to the evolution of lines of research in Social Psychology on racism in Brazil (Lima, 2020).<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_1539\" style=\"width: 577px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/humanas.blog.scielo.org\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/01\/Imagem1.png\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-1539\" class=\"wp-image-1539 size-full\" title=\"Book cover of &quot;Contribui\u00e7\u00f5es da Psicologia Social para o entendimento do racismo brasileiro&quot; by the same author.\" src=\"https:\/\/humanas.blog.scielo.org\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/01\/Imagem1.png\" alt=\"Book cover of &quot;Contribui\u00e7\u00f5es da Psicologia Social para o entendimento do racismo brasileiro&quot; by the same author.\" width=\"567\" height=\"809\" srcset=\"https:\/\/humanas.blog.scielo.org\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/01\/Imagem1.png 567w, https:\/\/humanas.blog.scielo.org\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/01\/Imagem1-210x300.png 210w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 567px) 100vw, 567px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-1539\" class=\"wp-caption-text\"><em>Image: <a href=\"https:\/\/storage.blucher.com.br\/book\/9788521220190_02.png \">Blucher<\/a>.<\/em><\/p><\/div>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Doise (1980) acknowledges the inherent arbitrariness in any classification, as theories often exhibit hybrid characteristics, involving multiple levels of analysis. Note that the very levels of racism production\/manifestation (individual, cultural, and structural) are also hybrid, with blurred or non-existent boundaries between them. To minimize additional arbitrariness, the classification of psychosocial theories by Doise (1980) will be followed.<\/p>\n<p>Another remarkable aspect is that three criteria were adopted when choosing which theories of racism to include in the analysis: (1) the theory must be formulated or developed within Social Psychology, (2) it must hold empirical support, and (3) theory impact, indicated by its presence in Social Psychology literature on the subject. The proposed classification also considered the scope of the theory: whether it was more general (about conflict) or more specific (about racism).<\/p>\n<p>Our results reveal, firstly, that statements such as \u201cthese European and North American models do not fit the reality of racism in Brazil\u201d are inaccurate, to say the least. In practice, these more individuating models have not even been tested or, at best, have been tested in an erratic way.<\/p>\n<p>Despite this underutilization by Brazilian psychosocial literature, the theories of Authoritarian Personality, Social Dominance, Aversive Racism, and the Closed Mind Hypothesis do have potential for analyzing racism in Brazil when we consider that the hallmarks of our cultural formation are elitism\u2014typical of social dominance\u2014conservatism, fear of change, ethnocentrism, and the \u201cdo you know who you\u2019re talking to?\u201d logic, emblematic of authoritarian personalities and closed minds.<\/p>\n<p>However, these theories have a potential for analyzing Brazilian racism that should not be ignored. The patriarchy that marks our cultural formation and the paternalism impregnated in the roots of our cordiality, important postulates of some of them, largely define the expressions of racism in Brazil.<\/p>\n<p>We have seen that the dimension of ethnocentrism, a necessary condition for the expression of racism in the Authoritarian Personality Theory and the Closed Mind Hypothesis, is less prevalent in Brazilian racism. Brazilian racism is not as ethnocentric as that of Europeans and Americans. Black individuals in Brazil are not an exogenous group; their otherness is not the logic of the external, but an otherness imposed from within.<\/p>\n<p>The main conclusion stresses the importance of testing the more individual-level psychosocial theories imported and confronting them with the peculiarities of our racist reality. This would be a way to combat decoloniality through interconnection, and to avoid combating one epistemicide with another.<\/p>\n<h3 align=\"justify\">To read the article, access<\/h3>\n<p>LIMA, M.E.O. Theories in Social Psychology: Intra-individual Explanations in the Racism Analysis in Brazil. <span class=\"s1\"><i>Paid\u00e9ia (Ribeir\u00e3o Preto)\u00a0<\/i>[online]. 2024, vol. 34, e3403 [viewed 9 January 2024]. <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1590\/1982-4327e3403\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1590\/1982-4327e3403<\/a>. Available from: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scielo.br\/j\/paideia\/a\/kfcMqbf9Rr5PV4sHQFpnWjn\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">https:\/\/www.scielo.br\/j\/paideia\/a\/kfcMqbf9Rr5PV4sHQFpnWjn\/<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<h3>References<\/h3>\n<p>LIMA, M.E.O. Contribui\u00e7\u00f5es da psicologia social para o entendimento do racismo brasileiro. S\u00e3o Paulo: Blucher, 2024.<\/p>\n<h3 align=\"justify\">External links<\/h3>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scielo.br\/j\/paideia\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Paid\u00e9ia \u2013 PAIDEIA<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Paid\u00e9ia \u2013 Social Media: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/paideiaribeiraopreto\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Facebook<\/a>\u00a0|\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/paideiaribeiraopreto\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Instagram<\/a>\u00a0|\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/revistaPaid%C3%A9ia\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Twitter<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Authoritarian Personality, Closed Mind, Social Dominance, and Aversive Racism theories, although rarely applied in our country, offer important contributions to understanding and expanding the debate on racism in Brazil, challenging the notion that imported theories are inadequate for local contexts. <span class=\"ellipsis\">&hellip;<\/span> <span class=\"more-link-wrap\"><a href=\"https:\/\/humanas.blog.scielo.org\/en\/2025\/01\/09\/social-psychology-theories-and-their-impact-on-racism-studies-in-brazil\/\" class=\"more-link\"><span>Read More &rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":698,"featured_media":1540,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[121,7],"tags":[120,145],"class_list":["post-1538","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-paideia","category-press-release","tag-paideia-ribeirao-preto","tag-psychology"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/humanas.blog.scielo.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1538","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/humanas.blog.scielo.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/humanas.blog.scielo.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/humanas.blog.scielo.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/698"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/humanas.blog.scielo.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1538"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/humanas.blog.scielo.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1538\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1542,"href":"https:\/\/humanas.blog.scielo.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1538\/revisions\/1542"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/humanas.blog.scielo.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1540"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/humanas.blog.scielo.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1538"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/humanas.blog.scielo.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1538"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/humanas.blog.scielo.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1538"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}