{"id":849,"date":"2021-04-27T15:00:35","date_gmt":"2021-04-27T18:00:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/humanas.blog.scielo.org\/en\/?p=849"},"modified":"2023-04-27T13:31:16","modified_gmt":"2023-04-27T16:31:16","slug":"profile-of-bolsonaro-voters-reveals-brazilian-variant-of-far-right-populism-disease","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/humanas.blog.scielo.org\/en\/2021\/04\/27\/profile-of-bolsonaro-voters-reveals-brazilian-variant-of-far-right-populism-disease\/","title":{"rendered":"Profile of Bolsonaro voters reveals Brazilian variant of far-right populism disease"},"content":{"rendered":"

Rogerio Schlegel, Assistant Professor at the Department of Social Sciences, Federal University of Sao Paulo (Unifesp), Guarulhos, SP, Brazil.<\/strong><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>The right-wing populist wave that has taken place in the United States, the United Kingdom, and other countries usually is supported by economic losers and resentful citizens longing for the coming back of a time when their nations supposedly were \u201cgreat\u201d. The article \u201cPolitical impacts of education: from the belief in a new citizen to Bolsonaro\u2019s election [Impactos pol\u00edticos da educa\u00e7\u00e3o: da aposta no novo cidad\u00e3o \u00e0 elei\u00e7\u00e3o de Bolsonaro]<\/a>\u201d, appeared in Educa\u00e7\u00e3o & Sociedade (vol. 42), has analized data from the 2018 Brazilian Electoral Study [Estudo Eleitoral Brasileiro, de 2018] and has found evidence that the right-wing advance has remarkable particularities in Brazil.<\/p>\n

The research has developed statistical analysis to isolate the independent effects on voting of education, income, occupation, age, religion, and other individual features, departing from a representative national survey conducted after the election. The results indicate that income and occupation were the best predictors of voting for Jair Messias Bolsonaro. Education did not have a consistent influence on this choice, despite the conventional expectation that the better educated would reject a candidate notorious for advocating authoritarian values and despising diversity.<\/p>\n

\"\"

Image:Jade Scarlato.<\/p><\/div>\n

The article is part of a dossier on \u201cEducation and Political Behavior<\/a>\u201d and has also tested the hypothesis that the Brazilian education might have fading effects on political participation and democratic support in recent years. The analysis of national surveys from 1989 to 2018 has revealed that the education impact on political behavior still holds, with one exception: the appreciation of voting. In 2018, there was no consistent differentiation among those with the lowest and the highest levels of educational attainment regarding the assessment of the vote.<\/p>\n

The findings point to the relevance of taking into account the particularities of Brazil when developing explanations for populist support. A hypothesis to be tested involves the possibility that a rejection to equality \u2013 either economic or regarding minorities rights \u2013 boosts the populist vote. At the same time, the relative disregard for voting among better-educated citizens might indicate a disenchantment with democracy, primarily salient among the most critical citizens. The 2020 election mobilized other political behavior dynamics, particularly for being held at the local level, leaving these hypotheses to be thoroughly investigated in 2022.<\/p>\n

The research Unequal Democratization [Democratiza\u00e7\u00e3o Desigual] has been supported by the S\u00e3o Paulo State Research Foundation (Fapesp); datasets on public attitudes were gratuitously provided by the Center of Public Opinion Studies [Centro de Estudos da Opini\u00e3o P\u00fablica], of state university Unicamp.<\/p>\n